<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Granted for AJAX and Other Web Technologies</title>
	<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/03/20/balthaser-ajax-patent</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: TextDrive Community Forum / Another ludicrous grant by the US Patent Office</title>
		<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/03/20/balthaser-ajax-patent#comment-9591</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/03/20/balthaser-ajax-patent#comment-9591</guid>
					<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I did a blog post on this which I won't rehash here, but the upshot is that the patent should be invalidatable due to prior art. Unfortunately, it seems to be prompting a bidding war rather than a legal battle. :( [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] I did a blog post on this which I won&#8217;t rehash here, but the upshot is that the patent should be invalidatable due to prior art. Unfortunately, it seems to be prompting a bidding war rather than a legal battle. <img src='http://www.adammessinger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%-->
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
