<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet: &#8220;a series of tubes&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Adam Messinger</title>
		<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25572</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25572</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Tom Sherman:&lt;/strong&gt; At least Larry King is relatively harmless. Ted Stevens can actually affect public policy, which makes him a dangerous liability.

The good news is that he's on his way out as chair of the Commerce Committee. The new Democratic majority means new committee leadership, and right now it looks like Daniel Inouye (&lt;acronym title=&quot;Hawaii&quot;&gt;HI&lt;/acronym&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://democrat.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=266000&amp;#38;&quot; title=&quot;Majority Leader Reid Announces Updated Democratic Committee Assignments for 110th Congress&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;will be taking up the top spot on the Commerce Committee&lt;/a&gt;. Inouye is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asiansvote.com/entries/000026.shtml&quot; title=&quot;AsiansVote - Inouye Fights for Net Neutrality&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a supporter of net neutrality&lt;/a&gt;, so things are looking a little better for our cause these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Tom Sherman:</strong> At least Larry King is relatively harmless. Ted Stevens can actually affect public policy, which makes him a dangerous liability.</p>
<p>The good news is that he&#8217;s on his way out as chair of the Commerce Committee. The new Democratic majority means new committee leadership, and right now it looks like Daniel Inouye (<acronym title="Hawaii">HI</acronym>) <a href="http://democrat.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=266000&amp;" title="Majority Leader Reid Announces Updated Democratic Committee Assignments for 110th Congress" rel="nofollow">will be taking up the top spot on the Commerce Committee</a>. Inouye is <a href="http://www.asiansvote.com/entries/000026.shtml" title="AsiansVote - Inouye Fights for Net Neutrality" rel="nofollow">a supporter of net neutrality</a>, so things are looking a little better for our cause these days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adam Messinger</title>
		<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25568</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25568</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;@HandsOff:&lt;/strong&gt; One of the most bizarre things about Stevens's speech is that he seems to claim that the net neutrality advocates are the ones that want to create a two-tiered Internet, and that this artificial regulation is what he's objecting to. He spends about half his time stammering out a half-baked argument which --- once deciphered --- seems to &lt;em&gt;favor&lt;/em&gt; the amendment he's opposing. The other half of his speech is an almost unintelligible rant that seems to argue &lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt; a two-tiered system. The whole thing is just surreal.

I think that educating our governing officials may ultimately be pointless. The ones who favor breaking net neutrality do so because the big telecommunications companies that donate to their campaigns &lt;em&gt;tell them to&lt;/em&gt;. The targets for outreach should be &lt;em&gt;conservative voters&lt;/em&gt;.

Conservatives are supposed to favor small government and deregulation. Voters who feel strongly about those notions need to understand that the net was &lt;em&gt;created&lt;/em&gt; to be neutral to different kinds of information from different providers. Doing anything else involves imposing regulations and new infrastructure to support the change. And it's not a change that serves the interests of the American people. Its only purpose is to enrich the telco giants by letting them pick the pockets of consumers and content providers.

A lot of centrist and liberal voters already oppose attempts to break net neutrality based on the civil liberties and freedom-of-speech problems such an action would cause. If conservatives were also rallied to the cause by framing it as a matter of excessive (and corrupt) regulation of the free market, the bipartisan momentum could finally crush the efforts of the anti-neutrality forces once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@HandsOff:</strong> One of the most bizarre things about Stevens&#8217;s speech is that he seems to claim that the net neutrality advocates are the ones that want to create a two-tiered Internet, and that this artificial regulation is what he&#8217;s objecting to. He spends about half his time stammering out a half-baked argument which &#8212; once deciphered &#8212; seems to <em>favor</em> the amendment he&#8217;s opposing. The other half of his speech is an almost unintelligible rant that seems to argue <em>for</em> a two-tiered system. The whole thing is just surreal.</p>
<p>I think that educating our governing officials may ultimately be pointless. The ones who favor breaking net neutrality do so because the big telecommunications companies that donate to their campaigns <em>tell them to</em>. The targets for outreach should be <em>conservative voters</em>.</p>
<p>Conservatives are supposed to favor small government and deregulation. Voters who feel strongly about those notions need to understand that the net was <em>created</em> to be neutral to different kinds of information from different providers. Doing anything else involves imposing regulations and new infrastructure to support the change. And it&#8217;s not a change that serves the interests of the American people. Its only purpose is to enrich the telco giants by letting them pick the pockets of consumers and content providers.</p>
<p>A lot of centrist and liberal voters already oppose attempts to break net neutrality based on the civil liberties and freedom-of-speech problems such an action would cause. If conservatives were also rallied to the cause by framing it as a matter of excessive (and corrupt) regulation of the free market, the bipartisan momentum could finally crush the efforts of the anti-neutrality forces once and for all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tom sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25479</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25479</guid>
					<description>Ted Stevens may be clueless, but at least he's been on the Intarweb.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/tv/larry_king_ive_never_used_the_internet_47672.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Larry King hasn't&lt;/a&gt; -- and refuses to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Stevens may be clueless, but at least he&#8217;s been on the Intarweb.  <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/tv/larry_king_ive_never_used_the_internet_47672.asp" rel="nofollow">Larry King hasn&#8217;t</a> &#8212; and refuses to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HandsOff</title>
		<link>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25237</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.adammessinger.com/2006/11/19/series-of-tubes#comment-25237</guid>
					<description>This video demonstrates exactly why we at Hands Off the Net are against Congressional regulation of the Internet.  Ted Stevens' comments reveal exactly how little Congress understands about the Internet and why any attempts on its part to regulate the Net would be disastrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video demonstrates exactly why we at Hands Off the Net are against Congressional regulation of the Internet.  Ted Stevens&#8217; comments reveal exactly how little Congress understands about the Internet and why any attempts on its part to regulate the Net would be disastrous.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
